newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu

0

replies

A question and proposal for draft-ietf-newtrk-cruft

started 2011-03-25 11:08:08 UTC

2011-03-25 11:08:08 UTC

Mykyta Yevstifeyev

1

reply

An updated ISD proposal

started 2010-07-15 08:02:31 UTC

2010-07-15 22:38:14 UTC

Douglas Otis

0

replies

WG Action: Conclusion of New IETF Standards Track Discussion (newtrk)

started 2006-08-18 00:50:01 UTC

2006-08-18 00:50:01 UTC

IESG Secretary

46

replies

IETF Process discussions - next steps

started 2006-08-10 14:42:21 UTC

2006-08-17 16:44:47 UTC

Brian E Carpenter

2

replies

I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-newtrk-questions-00.txt]

started 2006-06-10 12:20:24 UTC

2006-06-20 12:41:17 UTC

Douglas Otis

0

replies

[Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rfc2026-critique-01.txt]

started 2006-04-12 12:34:06 UTC

2006-04-12 12:34:06 UTC

Brian E Carpenter

20

replies

I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt

started 2006-04-05 20:03:02 UTC

2006-04-11 20:34:54 UTC

Brian E Carpenter

13

replies

I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-newtrk-repurposing-isd-04.txt

started 2006-03-10 02:50:02 UTC

2006-03-31 01:09:55 UTC

Douglas Otis

2

replies

I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-norm-ref-00.txt

started 2006-03-29 19:56:16 UTC

2006-03-30 18:47:54 UTC

Brian E Carpenter

0

replies

RFC 4450 on Getting Rid of the Cruft: Report from an Experiment in Identifying and Reclassifying Obsolete Standards Documents

started 2006-03-30 05:19:14 UTC

2006-03-30 05:19:14 UTC

r***@rfc-editor.org

4

replies

draft-ietf-newtrk-docid-00.txt

started 2006-03-23 23:32:23 UTC

2006-03-27 18:38:06 UTC

John C Klensin

0

replies

Draft genarea minutes for review

started 2006-03-24 04:33:28 UTC

2006-03-24 04:33:28 UTC

Brian E Carpenter

9

replies

Some "standards" really are one-level standards...

started 2006-03-16 21:47:23 UTC

2006-03-22 07:04:09 UTC

C. M. Heard

50

replies

the problem

started 2006-03-06 12:48:53 UTC

2006-03-22 01:29:42 UTC

Michael Richardson

2

replies

I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-newtrk-promotion-00.txt

started 2006-02-24 02:50:01 UTC

2006-03-19 21:40:19 UTC

Pekka Savola

66

replies

BCP 61, advancing to draft

started 2006-02-10 07:00:01 UTC

2006-03-07 20:27:07 UTC

Brian E Carpenter

0

replies

I-D ACTION:draft-loughney-newtrk-one-size-fits-all-01.txt

started 2006-03-07 05:59:02 UTC

2006-03-07 05:59:02 UTC

Robert Snively

0

replies

[Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-atkinson-newtrk-twostep-00.txt]

started 2006-03-05 16:08:38 UTC

2006-03-05 16:08:38 UTC

Brian E Carpenter

1

reply

[Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rfc2026-critique-00.txt]

started 2006-03-01 21:57:47 UTC

2006-03-01 22:10:36 UTC

Spencer Dawkins

2

replies

I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-newtrk-docid-00.txt

started 2006-02-28 02:50:01 UTC

2006-03-01 19:51:16 UTC

John C Klensin

2

replies

an alternate standards promotion process

started 2006-02-24 06:20:34 UTC

2006-02-24 11:50:04 UTC

John C Klensin

0

replies

An idea for process document handling

started 2006-02-23 14:15:47 UTC

2006-02-23 14:15:47 UTC

Harald Tveit Alvestrand

0

replies

Uplevelling the discussion

started 2006-02-14 19:57:02 UTC

2006-02-14 19:57:02 UTC

Brian E Carpenter

0

replies

(unknown)

started 2006-02-11 04:28:07 UTC

2006-02-11 04:28:07 UTC

Lucy E. Lynch

0

replies

interoperability reports: add security mechanism reporting?

started 2006-02-10 23:34:03 UTC

2006-02-10 23:34:03 UTC

Larry Masinter

3

replies

"Reviewed in the IETF" (was: Re: Document Action: 'US Secure ...

started 2006-02-07 19:16:28 UTC

2006-02-08 17:12:01 UTC

Brian E Carpenter

9

replies

"Reviewed in the IETF" (was: Re: Document Action: 'US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA and HMAC-SHA)'to Informational RFC)

started 2006-02-07 19:08:23 UTC

2006-02-08 06:36:23 UTC

Spencer Dawkins

0

replies

"Reviewed in the IETF" (was: Re: Document Action: 'U S Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA and HMAC-SHA)'to Informational RFC)

started 2006-02-07 20:03:46 UTC

2006-02-07 20:03:46 UTC

Wijnen, Bert (Bert)

0

replies

Document Action: 'Getting rid of the cruft: Report from an experiment in identifying and reclassifying obsolete standards documents' to Informational RFC

started 2006-01-28 04:40:12 UTC

2006-01-28 04:40:12 UTC

The IESG

11

replies

Recycling at Proposed seems to document best current practice in the MIB module space

started 2006-01-23 08:48:25 UTC

2006-01-27 14:03:22 UTC

Pekka Savola